<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boeing shuts down in-flight Internet access division</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geektieguy.com/2006/08/17/boeing-shuts-down-in-flight-internet-access-division/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geektieguy.com/2006/08/17/boeing-shuts-down-in-flight-internet-access-division/</link>
	<description>News and views from the geek tie guy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 17:24:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: charris</title>
		<link>http://www.geektieguy.com/2006/08/17/boeing-shuts-down-in-flight-internet-access-division/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>charris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 05:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geektieguy.com/2006/08/17/boeing-shuts-down-in-flight-internet-access-division/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure it&#039;s fair to compare it to household internet access - you are paying for convenience.  Still, I have to believe that more than a handful of people couldn&#039;t put it on their expense accounts for business.  This smells like someone didn&#039;t think through how people wanted to use it very well.  I&#039;m actually very puzzled as to how this failed so badly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s fair to compare it to household internet access &#8211; you are paying for convenience.  Still, I have to believe that more than a handful of people couldn&#8217;t put it on their expense accounts for business.  This smells like someone didn&#8217;t think through how people wanted to use it very well.  I&#8217;m actually very puzzled as to how this failed so badly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
